[Functionality/isokinetic work of quadriceps in patients with gonarthrosis managed with prolotherapy]. / Funcionalidad/trabajo isocinético de cuádriceps de pacientes con gonartrosis manejados con proloterapia.

Background: Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors. Material and methods: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee. Results: 37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks. Conclusions: In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.

Introducción: la proloterapia puede ser buena opción en el tratamiento complementario de pacientes con osteoartrosis de rodilla (OA), específicamente para el incremento de la funcionalidad. Objetivo: determinar la efectividad de la proloterapia en OA grado II-III en la funcionalidad y en el trabajo muscular de flexores y extensores de rodilla. Material y métodos: se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado a doble ciego. Incluyó a pacientes con el diagnostico de OA grados II-III. Al grupo experimental se les infiltraron 6 mL de solución glucosada al 25% y lidocaína al 0.05% en ambas rodillas; al grupo control con solución salina al 0.45% y lidocaína al 0.05%. Todos los pacientes recibieron un programa integral de rehabilitación. Se midió el trabajo isocinético de los músculos flexores y extensores de rodilla, dolor y funcionalidad, previa infiltración y a los tres meses de seguimiento. Para comparar la diferencia de medias, se aplicó la prueba de t de Student, considerando p < 0.05 como significativo. El proyecto se aprobó en el comité local de ética e investigación. Resultados: se reclutaron 37 pacientes, 17 en el grupo de proloterapia. No hubo diferencias intergrupo en la funcionalidad, trabajo isocinético de flexores/extensores de rodilla y dolor iniciales, ni durante el seguimiento hasta las 12 semanas. Conclusiones: en el presente estudio identificó que tanto la proloterapia como la infiltración con solución salina incrementaron la funcionalidad, fuerza y disminuyeron el dolor; sin embargo, no se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los dos grupos.

Can Achilles tendinosis be treated effectively with lidocaine and glucose infiltrations, and if so, is the effect lasting? A longitudinal, observational on 27 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to add to the small but growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Achilles intratendinous hyperosmolar dextrose prolotherapy and introduce a novel, preceding step of paratenon hydrodissection with lidocaine in patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis resistant to rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, observational study on 27 consecutive patients diagnosed with Achilles tendinosis, in whom conservative treatment, ie, physiotherapy or shock wave therapy, had failed. A 2% lidocaine paratenon anesthesia and hydrodissection was followed by ultrasound-guided, intratendinous injections of 25% glucose every 5 weeks. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used for pain assessment at rest, for activities of daily living, and after moderate exercise at the begining and at the end of the treatment. Moreover, tendon thickness and vascularisation were recorded at baseline and final treatment consultation. Effectiveness was estimated from scoring and relative pain reduction using a 95% CI. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test and a general linear model for repeated measures were applied. Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A median of 5 (1-11) injection consultations per patient were required. Pain scores decreased significantly in all three conditions (p < 0.001). Relative reductions were 75% in pain at rest (95% CI;61-93%), 69% in pain with daily living activities (95% CI; 55-83%), and 70% in pain after moderate exercise (95% CI; 57-84%). Tendon neo-vascularisation was significantly reduced (p < 0.001). We did not observe significant changes in tendon thickness (p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Achilles tendinosis treatment with paratenon lidocaine hydrodissection and subsequent prolotherapy with hyperosmolar glucose solution is safe, effective, inexpensive, and virtually painless with results maintained over time.

Comparative study of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in the local anesthesia of permanent mandibular first molars affected by MIH: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The current study compares articaine 4% with lidocaine 2% in terms of injection pain and effectiveness of anesthesia when treating permanent mandibular first molars (PMFMs) affected by molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH). In addition to comparing the complications of local anesthesia for both solutions. METHODS: The sample included 20 children. Each child was randomly assigned to either articaine 4% or lidocaine 2% in their first session with the other solution being used at the subsequent session. Injection pain and the effectiveness of anesthesia were assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces® Pain Rating Scale and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale. Parents were asked to report any complications of local anesthesia. The Wilcoxon-matched pairs signed-rank test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Patients experienced greater pain when receiving articaine 4% injections according to both scales, differences were statistically significant when using the Wong-Baker Faces® Pain Rating scale (p < 0.05). Whereas, the FLACC scale did not show such differences (P > 0.05). Although there were no significant differences between the two solutions regarding the effectiveness of local anesthesia according to both scales (P > 0.05), articaine 4% was clinically found to be more effective than lidocaine 2%. No complications of local anesthesia were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Articaine 4% injection was more painful than lidocaine 2%. However, both solutions were effective in anesthetizing PMFMs affected by MIH and without anesthetic complications in the studied sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial, NCT05200884, ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05200884 ).

Articaine versus Lidocaine in only buccal infiltration anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. A prospective split-mouth randomized-controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a single labial infiltration of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth without an additional lingual injection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized-controlled, split-mouth clinical study was implemented. Healthy adult patients seeking bilateral extraction of mandibular anterior teeth were included in this study. Teeth extractions were randomly assigned to two equal groups, where one mandibular anterior tooth was extracted using a solitary labial infiltration of either 4% articaine (the study group) or 2% lidocaine (the control group). After 14 days, the other mandibular anterior tooth was extracted using the other local anesthetic agent. The selection of the anesthetic agent injected in the first session was done in a randomized fashion. After 5 min of local anesthetic injection, the tooth was extracted, and each patient was asked to record the intensity of the extraction pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the study. The efficacy of a single labial injection for mandibular anterior teeth extraction was established by the fact that none of the patients in the study or control group required re-administration of local anesthesia. The mean VAS for pain control during tooth extraction was 1.16 ± 0.93 for the articaine group and 1.71 ± 0.90 for the lidocaine group. The pain score showed a statistically significant decrease in the articaine group compared to that in the lidocaine group (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Although the anesthetic effects of only buccal infiltration of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction of mandibular anterior teeth were comparable, the use of 4% articaine would have more effective and predictable outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS: ORG: (ID: NCT05223075) 3/2/2022.

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol using ice gel pack versus pre-treatment with lignocaine: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Regardless of the positive attributes of propofol, it is frequently associated with pain on injection. We compared the efficacy of topical cold thermotherapy using an ice gel pack with intravenous lignocaine pre-treatment for reducing pain on propofol injection. METHODS: This single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in 200 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective/emergency surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups: the Thermotherapy group- receiving an ice gel pack proximal to the intravenous cannula for 1 min, or the Lignocaine group-receiving 0.5 mg/kg of lignocaine administered intravenously, with occlusion proximal to the site of the intravenous cannula for 30 s. The primary objective was to compare the overall incidence of pain after propofol injection. The secondary objectives included the incidence of discomfort on the application of an ice gel pack, comparison of dose of propofol needed for induction, and hemodynamic changes at induction, between the two groups. RESULTS: Fourteen patients in the lignocaine group and 15 patients in the thermotherapy group reported pain. The incidence of pain and the distribution of pain scores were comparable among groups (p = 1.00). Patients of the lignocaine group required significantly less amount of propofol for induction as compared to the thermotherapy group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Topical thermotherapy using an ice gel pack was not found superior to lignocaine pre-treatment in alleviating pain on injection of propofol injection. However, topical cold therapy using an ice pack remains a non-pharmacological technique that is easily available, reproducible, and cost-effective. Further studies are required to prove its equivalence to lignocaine pre-treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI (CTRI/2021/04/032950).

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Surgery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Patients' Experience and Recall Bias in a Day-Care Setting.

Background and Objective: Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique of local anesthesia commonly used in the surgical treatment of a wide variety of conditions affecting the upper extremity, including Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The recent retrospective studies investigated patient experiences in a wide variety of hand disorder-related cases. The aim of our study is to evaluate patient satisfaction regarding open surgical treatment for CTS using the WALANT technique. Material and Methods: we enrolled 82 patients with CTS without medical record of surgical treatment for CTS. For WALANT, a hand surgeon used a combination of 1:200,000 epinephrine, 1% lidocaine, and 1 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution without tourniquet application and sedating the patient. All patients were treated in a day-care setting. For assessment of patient experience, Lalonde's questionnaire was adapted. Participants completed survey twice: one month and six months after the surgical treatment was performed. Results: the median pre-operative pain score for all patients was 4 (range 0-8) after one month and 3 (range 1-8) after six months. The median intraoperative pain score for all patients was 1 (range 0-8) after one month and 1 (range 1-7) after six months. The median post-operative pain score for all patients was 3 (range 0-9) after one month and 1 (range 0-8) after six months. More than half (61% after one month and 73% after six months) of the patients responded by stating that their real experience of WALANT was better than their initial expectations. An absolute majority of patients (95% after one month and 90% after six months) would recommend WALANT treatment to their relatives. Conclusions: overall, patient satisfaction with treatment for CTS using WALANT is high. Furthermore, complications related to the performed treatment and persistent post-operative pain could be associated with more reliable patient recall of this healthcare intervention. A longer period of time between intervention and assessment of patient experience could possibly be a reason for recall bias.

Ultrasound Combined With Single-Use Cervical Dilation Sticks And Lidocaine Achieved Good Clinical Outcomes In Hysteroscopic Removal Of The Intrauterine Device: A Pilot Study.

Objective: Our purpose of this study was to investigate the value of ultrasound combined with disposable cervical dilating stick and lidocaine in hysteroscopic intrauterine device (IUD) removal in postmenopausal women. Methods: Ninety-six postmenopausal women who requested IUD removal in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (48 cases) and a study group (48 cases) according to random number table method, with the control group undergoing conventional hysteroscopic IUD removal and the study group undergoing hysteroscopic IUD removal with ultrasound combined with a single-use cervical dilator rod and lidocaine. The time of IUD removal, subjective comfort evaluation scale (SECS) scores, treatment compliance, quality of life scale (SF-36) scores, IUD removal results, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) scores and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The ring removal time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, the postoperative SECS and SF-36 scores were higher than those of the control group, the compliance rate and the excellent and good rate of ring removal efficacy were higher than those of the control group, the postoperative HAD score was lower than that of the control group, and the incidence rate of complications was lower than that of the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: In hysteroscopic IUD removal, ultrasound combined with single-use cervical dilation sticks and lidocaine can gently soften and dilate the cervix in a short time, shortening the procedure time and reducing pain. The procedure is simplified, rapid, safe and has a high success rate.

The effect of lidocaine iontophoresis for the treatment of tinnitus: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Tinnitus is a common symptom with multiple causes and treatment options. Previous studies have investigated the effect of lidocaine iontophoresis. The aim of this review is to systematically present the effects on tinnitus and to derive possible effects. METHODS: In accordance to the PRISMA statement, the search and analysis were performed. An abstract in German or English and a performed intervention with lidocaine iontophoresis for the treatment of tinnitus, independent of the study design, were considered as inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, only a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: The search yielded 179 studies of which 170 were excluded. Six full-texts and three abstracts were included. In total, 957 patients were treated with lidocaine iontophoresis. The percent improvement in symptoms after lidocaine iontophoresis ranged from 4% to 62%. The qualitative assessment of the studies resulted in an overall "weak" rating for all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity and the limited quality of the studies found, no clear statement can be made about the efficacy. The number of those who benefited from therapy varied widely. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that the effect was merely due to electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Analgesic Effect and Safety of Lidocaine Liposome vs Oral Sucrose Water in Blood Collection and Intramuscular Injection in Neonates.

Objective: To compare the analgesic effect of oral sucrose water (Su) vs local application of lidocaine liposome (LC) in blood collection and intramuscular injection in neonates. Methods: A total of 300 neonates admitted to Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital in China between June 2019 and December 2021 who were to receive intramuscular injection and heel blood collection were enrolled in the study. The neonates were assigned to one of the following groups (n = 30 in each): control, 30% Su, 25% Su, 24% Su, 12% Su, 8% Su, LC 15-min, LC 30-min, LC 45-min or the combination group. The groups received different concentrations of Su or the application of LC liposome at different timepoints and the control group was given no analgesia. Before and after puncture, the Neonatal Facial Coding System-Revised (NFCS-R) was used for pain evaluation in the neonates. The heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and blood pressure (BP) in each group were compared, and the starting and ending time of crying and latent crying time were recorded and analyzed. After the optimal concentration of Su and optimal application time of LC were understood, the combination group was used to evaluate the analgesic effect of Su combined with LC. Results: Using various concentrations of Su, neonate pain was alleviated to varying degrees; 24%, 25%, and 30% Su did not reveal any difference in various investigation items, although their effect was superior to 8% and 12% Su. The LC 30-min and LC 45-min groups performed better than the LC 15-min group with regard to NFCS-R score, vital signs and BP. However, no notable difference was observed between the LC 15-min and LC 45-min groups in latent time. Moreover, the combination of 24% Su and application of LC 30 minutes before puncture provided a better analgesic effect than a single anesthesia intervention. Conclusion: The combination of 24% Su and the application of LC 30 minutes before puncture delivered better analgesic effect than a single anesthesia intervention alone.

Effects of Lidocaine Injection at Acupuncture Points on Perioperative Analgesia in Cats Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy.

Background: Pharmacopuncture is an acupuncture-related technique that has been used to amplify the therapeutic effects of different medications. Objectives: To investigate the analgesic efficacy of a lidocaine injection at acupoints in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Methods: Thirty cats were randomly distributed into two groups (n = 15, per group). The experimental group received a bilateral administration of lidocaine at the following acupoints: Stomach 36 (ST-36) and Spleen 6 (SP-6) (Lido group). The control group did not receive lidocaine (Control group). All cats were sedated with dexmedetomidine and anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. Intraoperatively, fentanyl was given to control cardiovascular responses to surgical stimulation. Postoperative pain was assessed at various time points, up to 24 hours after extubation, using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) and Glasgow feline composite measure pain scale (CMPS-Feline). Sedation scores were measured at the same time points. Morphine/meloxicam was administered as rescue analgesia. Data were analyzed using t-tests, Fisher´s exact test, the Mann-Whitney test, and the Friedman test (p < 0.05). Results: Intraoperatively, more cats in the Control group required analgesic supplementation than those in the Lido group, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.65). Postoperative pain, sedation scores, and analgesic requirements did not differ between groups. Rescue analgesia was given to 67% (10/15) of the cats in each group. Conclusion: The administration of lidocaine at ST-36 and SP-6 acupuncture points did not provide significant perioperative analgesic benefits in healthy cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Approach of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia is feasible for both transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). However, the optimal approach for PELD has not yet been established at the L5/S1 segment under local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the transforaminal approach with the interlaminar approach of PELD under local anesthesia for L5/S1 disc herniation (DH). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: From January 2019 to March 2020, 91 consecutive patients with L5/S1 DH who planned to undergo PELD in our unit were randomized to the transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD, n = 46) or interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD, n = 45). Both procedures were performed under local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. The clinical outcomes were assessed as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and modified MacNab criteria. Patient satisfaction surveys and surgical complications were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to the IELD group, the TELD group had a shorter operative time and postoperative bed rest time (P < 0.001) but a longer radiation time (P < 0.001) and lower VAS scores for intraoperative back pain (P < 0.001) and leg pain (P < 0.001). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the VAS scores, ODI scores, or modified MacNab criteria. The surveys showed a significantly higher satisfaction rate in the TELD group than in the IELD group (P = 0.014). Six patients in the IELD group (13.3%) needed extra intravenous injections of sufentanil because of intense pain during the procedure. In the IELD group, there were 2 cases of neuropathic pain after surgery. LIMITATIONS: Due to the study was included in a single spine center with a relatively small population and its relatively short-term follow-up, the study is not generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TELD and IELD can provide good clinical outcomes for L5/S1 DH under local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. TELD was superior to IELD in terms of surgical-related experience and complications.

Postsurgical neuropathic pain: lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster or oral treatments in clinical practice.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of the lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and oral first-line medications (OM) for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Data from a noninterventional, retrospective 24-week cohort study in patients with localized peripheral NP refractory to at least one recommended OM using anonymized German Pain eRegistry data were retrieved. A subgroup analysis was conducted on 531 datasets of PSNP patients. Results: Pain relief, improvements in pain-related impairments of daily living and quality of life, and tolerability were significantly greater under LMP than under OM (p < 0.001 for all parameters). Conclusion: These real-world data show the effectiveness and good tolerability of LMP for PSNP treatment in routine clinical practice.

Surgical procedures may lead to chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain often described as burning or shooting pain. This pain can be treated with medications that are swallowed (oral) or applied to the skin (topical). Our study compared the effectiveness and tolerability of the topical lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster with oral medications in 531 anonymized patient data sets from a German pain registry. Patients on the lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster had significantly better pain relief, significantly lower impact of pain on activities of daily life and quality of life and tolerated their treatment significantly better than those on oral medications. The lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster can be considered as an alternative effective and well-tolerated treatment option for postsurgical neuropathic pain in routine clinical practice.

Evaluation of the efficacy of Superior Cluneal Nerve Block in low back pain: A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment giving rise to low back pain (LBP) remains undiagnosed many times; in this clinical study authors have evaluated therapeutic role of lidocaine injection of SCN for low back pain relief in patients with SCN entrapment. METHODS: The present study was a prospective, observational study; 25 patients with unilateral LBP over the iliac crest and buttock for more than six months not responding to conservative measures were included in this clinical trial. SCN lidocaine injection was done under fluoroscopy guidance; patients having more than 50% reduction in numeric rating scale (NRS) score, for at least 2 h following SCN injection, were enrolled in the study and followed for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was severity of LBP, measured by NRS score. Secondary outcome measures were percentage pain relief; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, reduction of analgesic usage, DSM-IV score for psychological assessment. All these assessments were done prior to the procedure and at 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the NRS scores was observed at 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months after SCN lidocaine injection as compared to the baseline (P value < 0.05); authors also observed a significant pain relief and significantly reduced ODI scores, analgesic consumption and DSM scores compared to the baseline values (P value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A single SCN lidocaine injection provided significant pain relief in LBP patients with SCN entrapment for a period of 6 months.

Cardiovascular response to Gasserian ganglion ablation on trigeminal neuralgia under local anesthesia: a retrospective single-blind case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of Gasserian ganglion brings with it the difficult problem of how to provide adequate acesodyne therapy for patients in order to make the treatment more comfortable. In our study, we assess the safety and efficacy of lidocaine local anesthesia in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS: From January, 2017 to December, 2020, 80 patients in our hospital who were suffering from trigeminal neuralgia were treated with radiofrequency thermocoagulation through oval foramen. They were all enrolled in our study and randomly divided into a study group and a placebo group. In the study group an appropriate concentration of lidocaine was given outside and inside of the oval foramen after puncturing in place, while in the placebo group the same dose of normal saline was given in the same way. We then recorded the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and visual analogue scale (VAS) at different treatment temperatures. RESULTS: The values of MAP and HR in the study group were generally lower than those in the placebo group, and the difference was statistically significant. Additionally, the two groups showed a significant difference in MAP, HR, and VAS at different treatment temperatures. There were significant differences in MAP and VAS between the study group at the baseline as well as each time point thereafter, and the range of MAP and HR in the study group were lower than those in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Reasonable lidocaine local anesthesia can provide analgesic effects and prevent hypertension and arrhythmia during Gasserian ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Effects of Repeated Injection of 1% Lidocaine vs. Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treating Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle (UTM) with repeated injection of 1% lidocaine results in better alleviation of muscular stiffness and soreness as well as improved metabolism in the hypercontracted MTrP area than treatment with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT). Materials and Methods: A single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients suffering from MTrPs in the UTM. Thirty patients were treated with repeated injection of 2 mL of 1% lidocaine (three injections; one injection per week). Another 30 patients were treated with rESWT (three treatment sessions; one treatment session per week; 2000 radial extracorporeal shock waves per treatment session; positive energy flux density = 0.10 mJ/mm2). The primary outcome measure was pain severity using the VAS score. The secondary outcome measures included muscle elasticity index, pressure pain threshold and neck disability index. Evaluation was performed at baseline (T1), 15−30 min after the first treatment in order to register immediate treatment effects (T2), before the second treatment (i.e., one week after baseline) (T3) and one week after the third treatment (i.e., four weeks after baseline) (T4). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the primary and secondary outcome measures between the patients in the lidocaine arm and the patients in the rESWT arm at T1 and T4. Within the arms, the mean differences of all outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.001) when comparing the data obtained at T1 with the data obtained at T3 and the data obtained at T4. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that the use of rESWT in patients with MTrPs in the UTM is safe and leads to reduced pain and improved muscle elasticity, pressure pain threshold and neck disability index, without adverse effects. Larger trials are necessary to verify this. Clinicians should consider rESWT instead of injections of lidocaine in the treatment of MTrPs in the UTM.

Magnesium-Based Trigger Point Infiltrations Versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltrations in Chronic Pelvic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a novel, magnesium-based trigger point infiltration formulation is more effective in treating chronic myofascial pelvic pain than lidocaine-only infiltration. METHODS: This was a single-centre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of women diagnosed with chronic pelvic myofascial pain associated with trigger points. We compared a novel magnesium-based infiltration formulation with lidocaine infiltration of trigger points and with a control group of participants who were waitlisted for a chronic pain clinic. Treatment groups completed a 12-week program that included 8 trigger point injection treatments and 9 visits during which pain scores were recorded and questionnaires administered. The primary outcome measure was change in mean pain score between baseline and the final visit. Secondary outcomes included pain with function scores, scores on the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire, procedural pain, concomitant medication use, and complications. RESULTS: We assigned 44 women diagnosed with chronic myofascial pelvic pain associated with trigger points to either the magnesium-based infiltrate (n = 15), lidocaine infiltrate (n = 17), or waitlist (n = 12) group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, a clinically relevant decrease in mean pain score out of 10 was observed in the magnesium-based (-2.6 ± 3.2) and lidocaine (-2.9 ± 3.1) infiltration groups, but not in the waitlist group (-0.5 ± 2.3). The per protocol analysis post-hoc tests, adjusted for multiple comparisons, found a significant difference in the average change in pain score between the magnesium-based infiltrate and the waitlist groups (P = 0.045), while differences between the lidocaine infiltrate and waitlist groups approached statistical significance (P = 0.052). Both treatment groups saw improvements in pain with function and quality of life scores. CONCLUSION: While this study is underpowered, it does not support the use of a magnesium-based trigger point infiltrate in the treatment of chronic myofascial pelvic pain over lidocaine-only infiltration. Nonetheless, these results are consistent with current management recommendations and suggest improvements in pain, pain with function, and quality of life scores with either magnesium-based or lidocaine-only infiltration. We outline an approach to assessment and treatment that can be adopted by general gynaecologists.

Effect of platelet-rich plasma injections for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Patient with chronic nonspecific low back pain is weakened ligament, and prolotherapy is the effective treatment but their use remains controversial. These ligaments can be strengthened by platelet-rich plasma injection. We hypothesized that the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injection and prolotherapy may decrease pain and improved disability of patient with chronic low back pain. METHODS: This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial and was conducted for 3 years for patient enroll and follow-up. Thirty-four patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (duration of at least 3 months) refectory to conventional management were randomized to platelet-rich plasma injection and lidocaine injection. Patients were treated with weekly platelet-rich plasma or lidocaine injections at the lumbopelvic ligaments for 2 weeks and then weekly prolotherapy with 15% glucose for 2 weeks and followed up 6 months. Visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were evaluated at initial, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Four patients did not complete this trial. Three were in the platelet-rich plasma injection and 1 was in the lidocaine injection. RESULTS: The intensity of pain was significantly decreased in platelet-rich plasma injections at 6 months as compared lidocaine injections; between-group differences were 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.10-1.75 [P = .027]). All participants were significantly decreased pain and disability index at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months but there were no significant differences between groups except for visual analog scale at 6 months. The baseline parameters were no significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic nonspecific low back pain, the platelet-rich plasma injection in combination with prolotherapy is an effective intervention and either lidocaine or platelet-rich plasma injection significantly reduced disability. And injection at the lumbopelvic ligaments using the platelet-rich plasma and prolotherapy is also an effective treatment for pain.

'Pain-free TRUS B': a phase 3 double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of methoxyflurane with periprostatic local anaesthesia to reduce the discomfort of transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (ANZUP 1501).

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of inhaled methoxyflurane to periprostatic infiltration of local anaesthetic (PILA) during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies (TRUSBs) improved pain and other aspects of the experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial, involving 420 men undergoing their first TRUSB. The intervention was PILA plus a patient-controlled device containing either 3 mL methoxyflurane, or 3 mL 0.9% saline plus one drop of methoxyflurane to preserve blinding. The primary outcome was the pain score (0-10) reported by the participant after 15 min. Secondary outcomes included ratings of other aspects of the biopsy experience, willingness to undergo future biopsies, urologists' ratings, biopsy completion, and adverse events. RESULTS: The mean (SE) pain scores 15 min after TRUSB were 2.51 (0.22) in those assigned methoxyflurane vs 2.82 (0.22) for placebo (difference 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.75 to 0.14; P = 0.18). Methoxyflurane was associated with better scores for discomfort (difference -0.48, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.03; P = 0.035, adjusted [adj.] P = 0.076), whole experience (difference -0.50, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.08; P = 0.021, adj. P = 0.053), and willingness to undergo repeat biopsies (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.12-2.49; P = 0.01) than placebo. Methoxyflurane resulted in higher scores for drowsiness (difference +1.64, 95% CI 1.21-2.07; P < 0.001, adj. P < 0.001) and dizziness (difference +1.78, 95% CI 1.31-2.24; P < 0.001, adj. P < 0.001) than placebo. There was no significant difference in the number of ≥ grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that methoxyflurane improved pain scores at 15 min, however, improvements were seen in patient-reported discomfort, overall experience, and willingness to undergo repeat biopsies.

Retrospective study on the use of lidocaine constant rate infusions for the treatment of ileus in ruminants and camelids.

Limited knowledge exists regarding the use of lidocaine as a prokinetic in ruminants and camelids to treat gastrointestinal ileus. In this retrospective study, ruminant and camelid cases diagnosed with ileus and treated with a lidocaine constant rate of infusion were assessed for adverse reactions and medical outcomes. A review of medical records was performed to identify cases in which lidocaine was administered as a prokinetic. Ten cases were identified consisting of 8 cattle, 1 goat, and 1 alpaca. Nine animals improved with a lidocaine treatment. No adverse effects were reported during lidocaine administration. Nine animals were discharged, and 1 was euthanized.

The short-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation versus intravesical instillation for the urethral pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Urethral pain syndrome is a chronic condition characterized by disturbing feeling or server pain sensed at the urethra without specific treatment. This double-center, two-arm controlled trial aimed to explore the efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS) versus intravesical instillation (II) of heparin and alkalinized lidocaine for urethral pain syndrome (UPS). METHODS: Eighty eligible patients took three sessions of EPNS, or 1 session of II per week, for 6 consecutive weeks. The primary end point was the change of pelvic pain and urgency/frequency symptom (PUF) score from baseline to week 6. Secondary outcome measures included changes of visual analogue scale (VAS) score and three sub-score extracted from PUF score. RESULTS: The enrolled participants were all included in the intention-to-treat analyses, and baseline characteristics between the two groups were well balanced. The post-treatment PUF score decreased by 10.0 (7.00, 16.50) in the EPNS group, and by 7.0 (3.00, 10.00) in the II group. At the closure of treatment, the medians of changes in symptom score, bother score, pain-related score and VAS score were 6.50 (4.25, 10.00), 4.00 (2.00, 6.00), 6.00 (5.00, 8.00),4.50 (2.25, 6.00), respectively, in the EPNS group, and 4.00 (2.00, 7.00), 3.00 (1.00, 3.00), 3.00 (2.00, 6.00), 2.00 (1.00, 4.00), respectively, in the II group. All the between-group differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Compared with the II, the EPNS results in superior pain control and better relief of lower urinary tract symptoms, and deserves further attention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03671993).